10 Best Engines 2000 At-a-Glance

Audi AG 1.8L turbocharged I-4 150 hp, 155 lb.-ft. (A4)* Always entertaining, particularly with a manual.* Power's too meager for entry luxury.= Should perk up the Golf/Jetta, though.Audi AG 2.7L twin-turbo DOHC V-6 250 hp, 258 lb.-ft. (A62.7T)* Eye-opening torque, heroic acceleration.* Thrummy in the upper speed ranges.= Better than the 300-hp V-8. Storming.Acura 3.2L VTEC SOHC V-6 225 hp, 216 lb.-ft.

Audi AG 1.8L turbocharged I-4 150 hp, 155 lb.-ft. (A4)

* Always entertaining, particularly with a manual.

* Power's too meager for entry luxury.

= Should perk up the Golf/Jetta, though.

Audi AG 2.7L twin-turbo DOHC V-6 250 hp, 258 lb.-ft. (A62.7T)

* Eye-opening torque, heroic acceleration.

* Thrummy in the upper speed ranges.

= Better than the 300-hp V-8. Storming.

Acura 3.2L VTEC SOHC V-6 225 hp, 216 lb.-ft. (TL)

* More gumption than you expect.

* Sounds disinterested.

= Faultless, but a little cold.

BMW 2.5L DOHC I-6 170 hp, 181 lb.-ft. (323 Ci)

* Any inline six is a plus, particularly a Bimmer.

* Porkier new 3-Series blunts the shove.

= All "base" engines should be so fine.

BMW 2.8L DOHC I-6 193 hp. 206 lb.-ft. (328i)

* Butter smooth, feels unbreakable.

* Never thought we'd say it, but 190 hp ain't enough anymore - even from BMW.

= A classic cries out for a power boost.

BMW 3.2L DOHC I-6 240 hp, 236 lb.-ft. (M Coupe)

* Textbook throttle response, terrific intake, exhaust tones.

* We're not thrilled about an iron block for $40,000.

= We want this engine. Bad.

DaimlerChrysler 3.5L SOHC V-6 253 hp, 255 lb.-ft. (300M)

* Can't argue with the numbers.

* Numbers aren't everything.

= Powerful enough, but thrashy.

DaimlerChrysler Jeep 4.7L SOHC V-8 235 hp, 295 lb.-ft. (Grand Cherokee)

* Outstanding engine for the markets it's in.

* Brazen thirst.

= Will have lasting impact.

DaimerChrysler Mercedes 3.2L SOHC V-6 215 hp, 229 lb.-ft. (E320)

* Never feels strained.

* Mercedes has got to work on the throttle action.

= Solid design solidly engineered.

DaimlerChrysler Mercedes 4.3L SOHC V-8 268 hp, 288 lb.-ft. (ML430)

* Clever architecture, interesting noises.

* Power's on the low side of "competitive;" pricey.

= Like many Benz mills, performance is better than numbers indicate.

Ford 2L DOHC I-4 130 hp, 127 lb.-ft. (Focus)

* Really quite zingy.

* Useful power is only adequate.

= A lot better than it has to be, considering what some competitors get away with.

Ford High Output 2.5L DOHC V-6 200 hp, 169 lb.-ft. (Contour SVT)

* "Purpose-built" demeanor; genuinely special exhaust note.

* Basic design feels pushed to the limit.

= Too bad Ford can't spread this engine around ...

Ford/Lincoln 3L DOHC V-6 210 hp, 205 lb.-ft. (Lincoln LS)

* Rewarding to rev; give FoMoCo credit for hooking up a manual.

* Languid low-range betrays Achilles heel of all Duratecs.

= Competitive - for the most part.

Ford/Lincoln 3.9L DOHC V-8 252 hp, 267 lb.-ft. (Lincoln LS)

* Fit for a Jaguar, priced like a Ford.

* Stutters at tip-in.

= Show us a better V-8 for the money.

Ford 4.6L High Output DOHC V-8 320 hp, 317 lb.-ft. (Mustang Cobra)

* Revs like no muscle-car motor you've ever known.

* Apparently a lot of, ah - variability in the true output.

= Has never felt as strong as Ford claims, and now we know why.

Ford 5.4L SOHC V-8/5.4L SOHC supercharged V-8 260 hp, 335 lb.-ft./360 hp, 440 lb.-ft. (F-150/Lightning)

* Great guts, excellent driveability, supercharged is a hoot.

* Not exactly a fuel sipper.

= Superb meld of pass-car refinement and truck grunt.

Ford 6.8L SOHC V-10 300 hp, 430 lb.-ft. (Excursion)

* Pretty darn refined for a houseboat motor.

* Caterpillar really ought to be handling this one.

= Ford'll be ashamed - all the way to the bank.

General Motors 3.5L Twin Cam DOHC V-6 215 hp, 230 lb.-ft. (Aurora)

* Broad-shouldered power; awesome gene pool.

* Should make more power.

= Size really does matter.

General Motors Corp. supercharged 3.8L OHV V-6 240 hp, 280 lb.-ft. (Buick Park Ave. Ultra)

* Gets up and goes - hard - when you ask.

* Iron heads? C'mon GM.

= Ancient but startlingly effective.

General Motors 4.6L DOHC V-8 275 hp, 300 lb.-ft. (Seville SLS)

* Fastidious, convincing redesign for '00.

* Let's do away with the two different hp ratings.

= GM Powertrain's crown jewel.

General Motors 5.3L OHV V-8 285 hp, 325 lb.-ft. (GMC Sierra)

* Just the sort of grunt real truck buyers appreciate.

* Runs outta breath pretty quickly.

= With engines in Tundra, F-150, Dakota, OHVs are looking real tired.

General Motors 5.7L OHV V-8 345 hp, 350 lb.-ft. (Chevrolet Corvette)

* Still takes crap from no engine.

* We're drifting from our penchant for that "muscle" feel.

= You've got your money's worth, GM. Time to move on.

Honda 1L IMA I-3 73 hp w/max IMA, 91 lb.-ft. w/max IMA (Insight)

* Hybrid stuff all works gorgeously.

* Tough to truly "enjoy."

= The beginning of the end for IC only?

Honda 1.6L VTEC DOHC I-4 160 hp, 111 lb.-ft. (Civic Si)

* Hi-tech little engine for 17 grand.

* Not easy on the ears.

= Only dedicated rat-racers need apply. Pure nonetheless.

Honda 2L VTEC DOHC I-4 240 hp, 158 lb.-ft. (S2000)

* Stunning specific output, lovingly constructed.

* Too raw for volume-car application.

= How'd they do that?

Honda 2.2L VTEC DOHC I-4 200 hp, 156 lb.-ft. (Prelude)

* Unholy smoothness, still one of the best high-rpm sounds in the biz.

* Does "torque" not translate in Japanese?

= Wasted in the U.S., where working your engine now elicits road rage.

Mazda 2.5L DOHC V-6 170 hp, 165 lb.-ft. (MPV)

* Will spin its heart out for you.

* Sized for Japan at the expense of the U.S.

= This kind of compromise shouldn't have to happen anymore.

Mitsubishi 3L SOHC V-6 205 hp, 205 lb.-ft. (Eclipse GT)

* Superb driveability, surprising high-rpm torque, rorty but pleasant exhaust.

* Not as convincing in larger vehicles

= Impressive SOHC development.

Nissan 3L DOHC V-6 222 hp, 217 lb.-ft. (Maxima)

* Astonishing refinement; revs like the wind.

* We're not sure we feel this year's 32 extra horses.

= The benchmark V-6 of the decade, and probably a couple of decades to come.

Porsche 3.2L DOHC H-6 250 hp, 225 lb-ft. (Boxster S)

* Rewarding power, beautiful throttle response.

* Cost is an issue.

= Convincing, near-perfect execution of the boxer layout.

Saab 2.3L turbocharged I-4 230 hp, 258 lb.-ft. (9-3 Viggen)

* Thundering mid-range torque, great top end power.

* Extracting the juice without torque steer is hard work.

= Fantastic sporty engine; would win with all-wheel drive.

Toyota 1.8L DOHC I-4 180 hp, 133 lb.-ft. (Celica GTS)

* Another exhilirating example of high-redline fever.

* Same old story: no torque, constant eardrum siege.

= Honking good fun in limited doses, tantalizing technology.

Toyota/Lexus 4L DOHC V-8 300 hp, 310 lb.-ft. (GS400)

* NVH doesn't get any better; variable-valve stuff a worthy upgrade.

* A little sluggish just off the line.

= Perhaps the epitome of refined power.

Toyota 4.7L DOHC V-8 245 hp, 315 lb.-ft. (Tundra)

* Donor engine is the Lexus 4L V-8.

* Nothing another 40 hp and 40 lb.-ft. couldn't fix.

= Absolutely car-like - maybe to a fault?

Volvo 1.8L turbocharged DOHC I-4 160 hp, 170 lb.-ft. (V40)

* Decent low-rev punch, responsive throttle.

* Just not enough displacement.

= We all know Volvo buyers think power is irresponsible anyway.

Please login or register to post comments

Related Resources

What was the best car commercial from this year's Super Bowl broadcast?

Data Center
There are a number of ways to find data on WardsAuto:

BROWSE : Explore the breadth of WardsAuto data by geography and data type.
SEARCH: Use keywords and filters to search all data.
Reference: View reference and non-time-series data.
Public Data: A collection of data tables available to non-subscribers.

A subscription is required to see locked content.
We also welcome requests for customized data.

Go to Data Center