On November 7, election day in the U.S., the Supreme Court began hearing the question of whether U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paid too little attention to the cost-benefit aspect of its mandates. The implications are expected to be enormous, since the issue relates back to whether, in establishing the Clean Air Act, Congress laid down an “intelligible principal” to guide the EPA. The “intelligible test” definition was defined by the Supreme Court in 1928. Industry has ...
Premium Content (PAID Subscription Required)
"Court hears EPA cost/benefit issue" is part of the paid WardsAuto Premium content. You must log in with Premium credentials in order to access this article. Premium paid subscribers also gain access to:
All of WardsAuto's reliable, in-depth industry reporting and analysis
Hundreds of downloadable data tables including:
• Global sales and production data by country
• U.S. model-line inventory data
• Engine and equipment installation rates
• WardsAuto's North America Plant by Platform forecast
• Product Cycle chart
• Interrelationships among major OEMs
• Medium- and heavy-duty truck volumes
• Historical data and much more!
For WardsAuto.com pricing and subscription information please contact
Lisa Williamson by email: firstname.lastname@example.org or phone: (248) 799-2642
Current subscribers, please login or CLICK for support information.