Auto Suppliers Can’t Find Enough Engineers as Industry Recovery Takes Hold

The world has changed, vehicles are different and top engineers are not drawn to careers in the auto industry like they once were.

SAE Foundation’s "A World of Motion" program encourages school children to be engineers, but qualified grads in short supply.

After years of cutbacks and layoffs, a real recovery is taking hold in the U.S. auto industry. Production schedules are being increased, shifts are being added and long-postponed vehicle programs are being given the green light.

It should be cause for celebration, but the industry is finding a cruel twist in the nation’s slow economic revival: There does not seem to be enough engineers and skilled technicians to fill a skyrocketing number of new positions.

The problem is particularly acute at automotive suppliers. Companies cut staffs 20% to 30% in 2009 during the depths of the recession and scaled back internships and other programs designed to recruit new talent. Now they are playing catch-up as auto makers step up product-development schedules and begin to fill new-product pipelines for the ’14 and ’15 model years.

What’s more, an unprecedented number of new models are equipped with advanced powertrains and sophisticated electronic systems that require the work of electrical and software engineers, the type of technical specialties that are in high demand worldwide by a variety of industries.

With unemployment rates still painfully high, especially in industrial states such as Michigan, it seems shocking that companies would be struggling to fill jobs, but that is the lament from a wide range of suppliers big and small.

“It’s getting so bad we are having to bring in engineers from overseas, and most of them won’t stay long-term,” says a Detroit-based engineering manager.

Analysts agree that long term the auto industry has to intensify its already significant efforts to bolster math and science programs and lure young people into automotive engineering careers and counter the grim images of the last few years of layoffs and instability.

The SAE Foundation's "A World of Motion" program, for instance, is designed to bring vehicle engineering to life with fun educational activities aimed at K-12 students.

But these programs won’t answer the pressing need for qualified engineers that has developed almost overnight.

The Original Equipment Suppliers Assn. says the number of its member companies reporting problems hiring engineering and technical people soared from 42% in 2010 to 70% at the end of 2011.

And the Engineering Society of Detroit reports dramatic changes in its biannual job fairs, with the number of companies seeking engineers rising from 31 in spring 2009 to 51 in spring 2012, while the number of job applicants attending dropped from 1,385 to 613 during the same period.

Some call it an engineering shortage and are quick to blame the waning number of U.S. students graduating with engineering and related degrees, but those now studying the jobs issue say the problem is more complex.

For one, thousands of veteran automotive engineers have retired early or taken buyouts and permanently exited the industry. Many others were laid off, moved to other states to find work and are not coming back.

“It looks like a whole demographic has exited the industry,” says Dave Andrea, senior vice president-Industry Analysis and Economics, OESA.

A recent OESA survey reports an exodus of current engineering and product-development specialists from Metro Detroit to South America and Asia, posts that many up-and-comers would consider more glamorous and better for their careers than staying in the Midwest.

And then there is the large percentage of young electrical and software engineers who believe better career opportunities are available outside automotive.

An engineering chief at a major automotive supplier privately complained to a reporter recently that he now is competing with the likes of Google and Intel for engineering talent, even in Michigan, the heart of the U.S. auto industry.

But it isn’t surprising electrical and software engineers are looking elsewhere for jobs, saysBruce Belzowski, a research scientist at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

“It has to do with the culture of the auto industry,” he says. “Software and electronics folks were never running the show. You would never see those people as heads of departments.”

According to SAE member surveys, engineering salaries are largely dependent on how many direct reports a manager has, and in the auto industry, most of the key technical management positions still are held by mechanical engineers.

It is much easier for electrical and software engineers to see a clear path for future management positions at Google or hundreds of other major non-automotive companies looking to recruit talent, Belzowski suggests.

“(Automotive) companies need to tell a story, explain what their promotional track is. They really have to do a sell job,” he says.  “As the (vehicle) changes and evolves to a more electronic machine, the industry has to change itself.”

A source who asks not to be identified says there is another major reason suppliers in particular are having a tougher time hiring engineers compared with their auto maker customers: salaries.

Most suppliers chopped engineering wages and consolidated pay grades in 2009. Facing profit pressures and a fragile recovery, they have been reluctant to raise them. “OEMs have adjusted back up and are paying more. That’s why you don’t hear auto makers complaining too much,” the source says.

And that’s why the “engineering shortage” is more accurately described as a training and experience gap, saysKristin Dziczek, director-Labor and Industry Group at the Center for Automotive Research.

“I don’t doubt there are niche areas where it is extremely difficult to find candidates, but (the shortage of engineers) is not as widespread as it sounds,” she says. “This is an industry that very recently employed twice as many as it does now in a state with 9% unemployment.

“Some people retired and some died. Some people have the wrong mix of skills for what these new jobs are. But what we are really facing is there is no luxury of time to train and retrain people. We need plug-and-play (skills). We’re on such an upswing that you can’t take somebody that’s kind of close and spend six months or nine months to get them where they need to be.”

Dziczek pegs much of the blame on budget cuts that befell many student co-op and internship programs in 2008 and 2009, drying up a crucial source for new engineers with work experience in key areas.

“We’ve got a population of (semi-qualified) people with engineering degrees that need some retraining, cross training or skill upgrades to fit what is needed now. It’s not that there are not people, it’s that we don’t have time to upgrade their skills,” she says.

The solution is to treat this training shortfall like any other automotive supply-chain shortage, Dziczek says. “If it were another commodity for making vehicles, you’d pay more, develop substitutes and figure out ways to use less of it in some way.”

That means finding faster ways to train and retrain young graduates and older workers, outsourcing some work or finding talent in the far corners of corporate structures.

It also means figuring out new ways to make auto industry jobs more attractive, offering international assignments early in careers and finding talent through different methods such as social networks. 

Smart companies are listening. For instance, Continental, a major global supplier with deep roots in Michigan and the Midwest, now has a program that allows entry-level engineers to gain invaluable international experience by rotating through assignments in company operations in China, South America, Germany and Eastern Europe.    

Part of the rotation might include following a specific product under development throughout the world, says Pete Carozza, Continental’s director-Human Resources for North America.

“That’s not how things used to happen. Engineers often had to work years to get such experience,” a spokesman adds.

Part of the strategy is to rebrand the auto industry with a more exciting, global image that will help attract young people, Carozza says. That includes having booths at auto shows and elsewhere that play up Continental’s advanced technologies to the public.

It also means having a career page on Facebook and highlighting company events and student programs on social networks, says Ann Baker-Zainea, Continental’s manager for NAFTA-region staffing.

All supplier sources contacted decline to discuss the pay issue, but Baker-Zainea says Continental constantly is doing studies to make sure the company remains competitive.

She stresses that attractive compensation packages aren’t always about the salary number. They also include many health-care options and various other types of benefits and compensation.

The bottom line is that the world has changed, vehicles are different and top engineers are not drawn to careers in the auto industry like they once were. Automotive suppliers in particular are going to have to work much harder at recruiting talent they once took for granted.

dwinter@wardsauto.com

Discuss this Article 7

dwinter@wardsau...
on Apr 10, 2012

My dad was an auto engineer. He made it sound like it was the most exciting job anyone could have. Are folks who live in emerging economies the only ones these days who get excited about engineering and building vehicles?

is228979
on Apr 10, 2012

I think the math scares a lot of people off. That's what turned me away when I was just leaving high school and shortly into college. My dad is an engineer for an OEM and even he said, "yeah, it's basically 1-2 years of math, but you don't/won't necessarily use all of it. Just get through it and onto the fun classes."

After meeting people my age that have engineering degrees and hearing what they do, it'd be a pretty sweet gig. Although most college's in this state don't offer engineering programs for working professionals, as all classes are during the day for undergrads.

mgjohnson
on Apr 11, 2012

Residents of Metro Detroit keep screaming: "We want jobs!!", but the sad fact is we are totally underprepared and undereducated for the 21st centure job market. Over half of adults living in the City of Detroit haven't finished high school. I agree with physicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson when he says we need another "1960's-style Apollo Moon Program" to inspire and ignite the thirst for knowledge in our young people.

Sammy
on Apr 11, 2012

The Automotive and supplier communities big problem is recruiting because of the way that they treat their engineers. I was and Electrical Engineer and worked for GM/Delphi for more than 30 years and was forced into early retirement as with many other salaried personnel. Plus we lost all of our healthcare and our pension was forced into the PBGC which was also reduced again. There are 20,000 of us in Ohio alone and we will communicate to the world wide community as how people are treated by the automotive community. Our forum is the internet and communicating at our respective colleges. It may take years for the automotive community to recover their PR problem. I must admit that I did enjoy my career in the autimotive world but I would highly advise any future engineer to stay away from the automotive industry until they guarantee better treatment for their employees and go back and live up to their previous commitments especially Delphi .

coolman99
on Apr 12, 2012

The auto industry has not had much appreciation to electrical engineers and their talent.
It is probably the toughest field of engineering, and not many (relatively speaking) graduate with EE degrees from highly respected universities due to the difficulty of the field.

People with business degrees and MBAs have traditionally been promoted to the top jobs, making millions of dollars, plus corporate jets use, incredibly generous benefits, while electrical engineers struggle to make a middle-class living, while nervously waiting to see if their name is going to be on the next list of layoffs!

In times of trouble (which is known to be cyclical in this industry), the first 10% or 20% to be laid off are most likely to be EEs, while MR. MBA continues to collect his check, which can be of a value more than that of the paychecks of 10 EEs combined.

Look at what happened at one of the major automakers in the Detroit area over the past 10 years. It was just waves & waves of 10% layoffs, quarter after quarter, year after year, and the vast majority of them are engineers. Many of them, if not most, are among the best in the industry.

I say that because I know many of them. I worked for the auto industry, and I was supervised by a person who did not have an engineering degree, and did not know much about the multiplication table, but his / her paycheck was twice as big as mine was!
Obviously he/she was not nearly in a position to use my background & education, not even 10% of it.

Not many with business degrees were let go!!!
Now that the cycle is beginning to swing up, they are finding that business degrees just can't make cars, especially cars of nowadays!

Time for them to have some respect for the engineering talent. If I feel I am a disposable commodity at an industry, I don't want to ever work for such industry.

It's too bad that engineers do not have a union of their own!

grumpy
on Apr 13, 2012

I don't think there is a shortage of engineers. There is a shortage of engineers that will put up with the BS for what they want to pay. I worked as an auto engineer for one of the biggest tier I's in the world. I can't say who since I don't want to get a nasty letter from those jackwagons [again]. I will say that the founder likes his race horses though. I met a lot of great people and got to work with a drive a lot of vehicles but otherwise it was a miserable experience. Outsourcing to China. Relaxing standards so cheap Chinese parts will pass. Being encouraged to fake or bend the truth on test results to make target dates or dollar figures. Micromanagers that only care about themselves and dollar figures. Getting screwed out of a bonus you earned because the plant your office is attached to lost money that year even though your employer has $6B in cash. Losing your 401k match. Watch your employer prepare to move the plant and several thousand US jobs to Mexico by thinking of creative ways to avoid paying severance.

I wouldn't work for that employer again unless they paid me the 5 figures they owe me plus interest and doubled my current salary. I'd have to see double my current salary to work for anybody in the auto industry. For any less it isn't worth the headache.

ragtoiplvr
on Apr 16, 2012

It is hard to feel sorry for them. Automotive used to have the best and brightest engineers because it was so sexy. Now the MBA's who could not pass the first year math for engineering, move in at huge salaries. Well, tisk tisk, we do not need all these engineers, lay them off. Then they need some, rather than consider many of the ones they canned, they want "Young and energetic" talent. That talent has seen how they will be treated so they avoid the field. So they hire H1B claiming a shortage, and get some engineer that has never even driven a car.

Yet, a fully qualified and experienced engineer is deemed too old, there must be a shortage. Of course this comes from managers that could not pass the first year engineering math.

Feel sorry for them, BS. If the board of directors, as well as the big mutual funds that own most of the stock, were competent they would kick the idiots out on their ears. Oh wait, they could not pass the first year engineering math either.

Yet they do not get what they deserve. How messed up is that.

Rod

Please or Register to post comments.

Related Resources

Interest in autonomous vehicles continues to grow, but technical, legal, regulatory and cost hurdles remain. When will true driverless cars reach the U.S. market?