2018 Wards 10 Best Engines Quick Hits
A pro-and-con summation of all 32 powertrains evaluated in the 2018 competition. Many comments come directly from editor scoresheets. Winners in red.
January 2, 2018
Audi
2.5L turbo 5-cyl. 400 hp (Audi RS3)
+ 160 hp per liter; sounds terrific in sport mode
- A little lag but ultimately delivers punch
= DCT OK but really needs manual
3.0L turbo V-6 354 hp (Audi S4)
+ As ZZ Top says – got legs, knows how to use them
- We miss supercharger kick
= Wholly competitive with BMW’s B58 6-cyl. turbo
BMW
2.0L turbo B46 I-4/PHEV 248 hp total (BMW 530e)
+ 40 lb.-ft. more ICE torque than last year’s 330e tester
- Lifeless once electric range is sapped
= Saw 46 mpg over 600 miles of testing
BMW X3 with B58 3.0L inline 6-cyl. turbo.
+ Sounds throaty, very entertaining in sport mode
- Lacks jump in portly CUV
= Boy, we sure miss this engine in M240i
Fiat Chrysler
3.6L Atkinson V-6/PHEV 260 hp total (Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid)
+ Drove 27 miles, yet burned only 17 miles of EV range
- Some might dislike space-age powertrain “whir,” but not us
= Finally, a fuel-efficient people hauler for the masses
Ford
2.3L EcoBoost I-4 350 hp (Ford Focus RS)
+ Pulls like leashed pit bull
- Please, try another exhaust system
= All-wheel-drive rally star, but very thirsty
2.7L EcoBoost V-6 325 hp (Ford F-150)
+ Same 400 lb.-ft. of torque as 5.0L V-8, at lower rpm
- Why can’t all stop/start systems be this smooth?
= Could turn us into truck lovers
3.5L EcoBoost V-6 450 hp (Ford F-150 Raptor)
+ EcoBoost just keeps paying dividends
- Predictably meager fuel economy
= Another $64,000 pickup truck fills a niche
5.0L V-8 460 hp (Ford Mustang GT)
+ Just the right amount of Voodoo
- Regulators are bearing down
= Sing it, Floyd: We don’t need no forced induction
General Motors
Electric propulsion system 60-kWh (Chevrolet Bolt EV)
+ Adios, range anxiety
- One-pedal driving takes some getting used to
= Take that, Tesla
1.5L I-4/EREV 101 hp total (Chevrolet Volt)
+ Topped 80 mpg with frequent charging
- Needs more oomph pulling away on highway
= History will be kind to this propulsion system
1.5L turbo I-4 170 hp (Chevrolet Equinox)
+ One editor topped 30 mpg; tremendous stop/start
- A bit lacking in low-end torque
= Amazingly smooth, quiet for such a small engine
1.6L turbodiesel I-4 137 hp (Chevrolet Equinox)
+ Impressive midrange torque; 35 mpg observed
- Grumbly cold starts; vibrations persist
= Diesels slipping behind best electrified powertrains
Buick LaCrosse eAssist mild hybrid with 2.5L 4-cyl.
+ 15 kW of power from motor generator
- Car this big really needs V-6, or a turbo-4
= Love to see 32 mpg in big sedan
Honda
Polymer electrolyte fuel cell 130 kW (Honda Clarity)
+ Gobs of torque; 366-mile range; silent as empty library
- About that hydrogen fueling infrastructure…
= Raises the bar for zero-emission driving
1.5L turbo I-4 190 hp (Honda CR-V)
+ 127 hp/L from mainstream 4-cyl. in a CUV? Wow.
- Lackluster mileage
= Smooth and quiet, with 20 hp more than Equinox
2.0L turbo I-4 252 hp (Honda Accord)
+ What, this isn’t the 3.5L V-6?
- Needs 6,500 rpm for full power
= A sure winner if not for Civic Type R
2.0L turbo I-4 306 hp (Honda Civic Type R)
+ Big turbo means big power
- Minimal torque steer, but would love AWD
= You’re just my Type
Hyundai
1.4L turbo I-4 128 hp (Hyundai Elantra Eco)
+ Great powertrain in package under $22k
- Transmission lurching mars experience
= A lot more compelling last year
Hyundai Ioniq PHEV.
+ Topped 54 mpg during 600 miles of testing
- Feels underpowered on freeway
= Lost in a sea of plug-ins
3.3L twin-turbo V-6 365 hp (Genesis G80 Sport)
+ Creamy smooth, and strong like V-8
- Vibration through steering column and door panel
= Nothing shabby about 25 mpg, big fella
Infiniti
3.0L twin-turbo V-6 300 hp (Infiniti Q50)
+ Cost-effective option if 400 hp unnecessary
- Hoping for better than 22 mpg
= But don’t you really want the 400 hp?
3.0L twin-turbo V-6 400 hp (Infiniti Q50/Q60 Red Sport)
+ All bite and no whiny turbo bark
- Well, maybe a little growl would be nice
= The alpha dog among luxury turbo-6s
Jaguar Land Rover
2.0L turbo I-4 247 hp (Jaguar XF)
+ Peak torque (269 lb.-ft.) at astonishing 1,200 rpm
- Ingenium a bit late to luxury turbo-4 party
= So looking forward to 296-hp variant next year
3.0L supercharged V-6 380 hp (Jaguar XE)
+ Nice induction sounds, and 23 mpg impressive
- Is supercharger lag now a thing?
= Premium V-6 with substandard stop/start system
Kia
3.3L twin-turbo V-6 365 hp (Kia Stinger)
+ Illegal speed arrives quickly – about 4.7 seconds
- Might be lost on Kia’s conventional customer
= No Genesis flab makes all the difference
Mazda
2.5L turbo I-4 227 hp (Mazda CX-9)
+ Notable combustion engineering, exhaust design
- Wanting in high-speed passing maneuvers
= Still competitive in ultra-competitive CUV segment
Subaru
Tachometer of Subaru Impreza, with 2.0L 4-cyl. boxer, at startup.
+ 32 mpg in real-world testing
- Tragically underappreciated
= Ready to run; great daily driver; bargain at $22k
Toyota
2.5L I-4 203 hp (Toyota Camry)
+ Responds kindly at wide-open throttle
- Definitely a little harsh when cold
= Natural aspiration still getting job done
2.5L I-4 HEV 208 hp total (Toyota Camry Hybrid)
+ Intense focus on manufacturing, combustion engineering
- Do hybrid shoppers want this much style?
= Outstanding ICE thermal efficiency of 41%
Volkswagen
Electric propulsion system 36 kWh (VW e-Golf)
+ Edges out Bolt in fun-to-drive test
- Sorely lags Bolt in battery-range test
= Just the beginning of VW’s EV market barrage
2.0L B-cycle turbo I-4 174 hp (VW Passat)
+ Closing intake valves earlier improves combustion
- Sport mode feels sadly like eco mode
= 8% improvement in efficiency, fuel economy
Volvo
2.0L turbo/supercharged I-4 PHEV 400 hp total (XC60 Hybrid)
+ T8 powertrain surprisingly brawny, yet smooth
- So-so fuel economy; rough gas/electric transitions
= Punches like great prize fighter
Read more about:
2018 10 Best EnginesYou May Also Like