Highly Awarded BMW I-6 Remains Close to Perfection

“The main reason why we have kept the inline 6-cyl. is there is no other way to have the smoothness or the responsiveness, the turbine-like feeling when revving the engine,” says Markus Rülicke, BMW’s head of construction design for in-line petrol engines.

Gary Witzenburg, Correspondent

October 23, 2017

6 Min Read
Highly Awarded BMW I-6 Remains Close to Perfection

WardsAuto has begun testing for the 2018 Wards 10 Best Engines competition, marking our 24th year of recognizing outstanding powertrains. This is the story behind one of our 2017 winners. The 2018 Wards 10 Best Engines will be announced in mid-December.

Almost as predictable as sunup and sundown is the near-certainty that a BMW inline 6-cyl. engine will take home a Wards 10 Best Engines trophy, year after year. 2017 marks the 27th such award in BMW’s near-unbroken string of high honors for its I-6 engines, including times when two versions won the same year, and the second straight for its 3.0L B58 iteration.

All new in 2016, the B58 turbo I-6 is the core member of a completely new all-aluminum modular “B” engine family that shares pistons, rods, valvegear and other key parts with 3- and 4-cylinder siblings, all with 500 cc cylinder displacements. It also is the last remaining I-6 available in a U.S.-market car.

“The main reason why we have kept the inline 6-cyl. is that there is no other way to have the smoothness or the responsiveness, the turbine-like feeling when revving the engine,” says Markus Rülicke, BMW’s head of construction design for in-line petrol engines. “That is worth more than the packaging challenge of the added length.”

But what about weight distribution? Doesn’t the straight-six engine’s added length put more of its mass up front compared with a V-6?

“It depends how you put the engine in reference to the front axle,” he responds. “We put the front axle quite far forward, so most of the engine weight is behind it,” he says. The I-6 also is lighter than a comparable-displacement V-6, and it’s easier to service with only one cylinder bank instead of two.

The main design objectives for the new B58 were increased efficiency, quicker throttle response and even smoother operation vs. the older-design same-displacement N55 turbo I-6. To meet those objectives, it features direct fuel injection, Double-VANOS variable camshaft timing, “TwinPower” (twin-scroll) turbocharging and a redesigned Valvetronic fully variable valve lift system. Its block, head and valvegear also are redesigned for a 5-mm longer stroke, a 2-mm smaller bore diameter and a higher 11.0:1 compression ratio, while its turbocharger’s turbine and compressor wheels are larger than the N55’s by 6% and 10% respectively.

For improved response and power output, the turbocharger is a new Bosch Mahle Turbo Systems unit. A new water-to-air intercooler is integrated into the intake plenum, and a new engine-mounted encapsulation system helps retain heat for easier restart, quicker warm-up and lower emissions.

Partly thanks to a better-balanced crankshaft and a new stiffer, lighter crankcase, the B58 also improves on the N55’s already excellent smoothness and quietness.

In addition, Rülicke believes the B58’s LDS cylinder liner coating may be an industry first. This coating is applied by heating conductive metal wire to its melting point, then electric arc wire high-pressure spraying it onto the cylinder barrels. The resulting 0.3 mm layer of ferrous material is extremely wear-resistant and very efficient at transferring heat from the combustion chambers to the crankcase and the coolant ducts.

One other key technology is a heat management module designed to handle high temperatures. “You always try to keep the coolant around 100° C to 105° C (212° F to 221° F) to have the lowest friction possible,” Rülicke explains, “so we can regulate this very, very well.” Another is an electric turbocharger wastegate with a very wide opening angle, which he says helps heat up the catalyst quickly and improves throttle response due to its much quicker reaction time compared with a pressure-actuated waste gate.

While the 2016 10-Best trophy was earned by the 320-hp version of the B58 that WardsAuto judges evaluated in a ’16 340i sedan, this 335-hp version was tested in a smaller and quicker ‘17 M240i coupe. The primary difference between the two, according to Rülicke, is increased boost pressure, along with “de-throttled” intake and exhaust systems and a “fine-tuned, tailor-made calibration for the M240i.”

Increased Intake Air Flow, Less Exhaust Restriction

By “de-throttled,” he means slightly upsized for increased flow. “We modified the intake system to have less pressure drop, increased the area about 5%, tried to avoid sharp edges and did a lot of fine tuning. We also increased the diameters of the exhaust system by 5 mm (0.2 in.),” he says. There’s also a new muffler that provides less restriction and a sportier exhaust note.

In addition to 15 more horses, this engine’s peak torque is an impressive 369 lb.-ft. (500 Nm) vs. the standard version’s 330 lb.-ft. (447 Nm). “That is quite good,” he says, because the higher the torque, the greater the risk of knock. We put a lot of effort into it to deliver the 250 kW (335 hp) and 500 Nm without any knocking issues and with very good fuel consumption.”

We ask whether the standard stop/start feature may be smoother than earlier versions. “It is a bit smoother,” Rülicke says, “because we try to make it quicker. The 6-cyl. is a very forgiving engine for the auto start/stop, but we did refine the system because we know that it had not been very well-received, especially in the U.S. But we don’t make the engine mounts as weak as some competitors’ because we still want the sportiness and responsiveness that you can feel, not to lose it in weak engine mounts.”

“The 3.0L B58 idles with serene confidence and revs with buttery smoothness, no matter how close to redline,” observes Wards 10 Best Engines judge Tom Murphy. “In two short years, it has become a workhorse for BMW, powering versions of the 3-, 4-, 5- and 7-Series.” Its EPA fuel-economy ratings in the 340i are 19/28 mpg (12.4-8.4 L/100 km) city/highway, with the standard 6-speed manual and 21/32 mpg (11.2-7.4 L/100 km) with the available 6-speed automatic.

Murphy points out the 335-hp B58’s toughest competitor in 2017’s competition actually was the older-design N55 turbocharged I-6, which lives on in pumped-up form in BMW’s track-ready M2 coupe: “The M2 engine spins faster and makes more horsepower (365), but the B58 has a longer stroke, makes more torque and sprints to 60 mph (97 km/h) in 4.4 seconds, while approaching 26 mpg (9 L/100 km) during our testing.”

He adds that the 330i’s B46 2.0L turbocharged 4-cyl. “came within a hair of joining its B58 big brother on the list this year. And the 1.5L 3-cyl. that powers the Mini Cooper is a hoot, too.”

Rülicke and his team have been delighted with such reviews: “It is very nice at the end of your work on a new engine generation to receive such positive feedback,” he says. “I can’t tell you much about it now, but we already are working quite hard on an even better version.” 

Read more about:

2017 10 Best Engines

About the Author

You May Also Like